Jesus – A Real Historical Figure?

Sep 30, 2020 2338

It’s interesting that a recent survey in the United Kingdom discovered that 40% of adults don’t believe that Jesus was a real historical figure.

And the reason why this is interesting is that qualified historians, whether Christians or atheists, almost universally agree that Jesus actually really did exist. It just goes to show the power of the myths out there in popular culture.

The evidence for the existence of Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and widespread. In addition, it’s early, detailed, and able to be corroborated – basically everything you’d look for if you were trying to find reliable historical evidence. 

Of course, you’d expect any surviving eye-witness accounts to be written by his friends and that’s precisely what we find. Every now and then you come across someone saying that you have to discount the written Gospels in the Bible because they’re biased.

Well, of course, they are! The eye-witnesses wrote about Jesus because they were impressed by him. You have to have some reason for putting things down on paper otherwise no one would ever write anything. And if you discounted any writings from ancient history on the basis that they were for or against their subject, you’d basically have almost nothing left! So, the arguments about the gospels having to be discounted because they were written by Christians is ridiculous. You have to evaluate each piece of evidence on its own merit.

Verifiable Proof That Jesus Was A Real Historical Figure

The first writings that talk about Jesus were written around 25 years after his life, with his detailed biographies dating from around 15 years after that. These writings are full of verifiable historical details, written down very soon after the events themselves. Anyone among thousands of people who lived through the events could have objected and said,

“That story about Jesus of Nazareth, it’s all made up! It’s a load of rubbish. I know. I was there!

But that never happened.

It’s a striking fact of history that there was never any debate at all in the ancient world about whether Jesus of Nazareth was a real historical figure, and not even among his opponents! The Jewish Rabbis denounced Jesus for various reasons but never doubted his existence. The same was true for pagan writers like Celsus who wrote against Christianity. So, there’s also plenty of hard evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ that comes from people who were biased against him, like from the Jews themselves, including the historian Josephus, and pagan writers and historians like Pliny and Tacitus.

Even if you wanted to throw out all of the irrefutable evidence for the existence of Jesus of Nazareth as a real historical figure, the bottom line that you’d still have to deal with is that something seismic happened in the south-eastern corner of the Roman empire in the first third of the first century. Whatever it was turned the world upside down, conquering the Roman empire, and it profoundly shaped civilisation on this planet as we know it today.

Take away Jesus and you’ve got nothing… Nothing with which to explain all of that. All you have is a Jesus-shaped hole in history.

Of course, one question always leads to another. And if Jesus really did exist, then you can’t just rule a line under that and say, “OK, that’s it. Yes, he existed.” At least not if you are a rational person.

Because I believe that the implications of the existence of Jesus Christ lead you to recognise who he is and to accept him as Lord and Saviour.

– Eliezer Gonzalez

Are you enjoying The Big Question videos? Here is a link to more of them on the GNU YouTube page:

This article could reach further through YOUR BUSINESS

We have a group of businesses who are resourcing Good News Unlimited to reach further by investing in our outreach capacity. YOUR BUSINESS could help us reach further through our Digital Marketing initiatives to see more people connect with Jesus through His life-transforming message.

This is a sample Facebook Ad for this content